Home


Archive for the ‘Who Dat’s’ Category

Sep

19

Bobby Hebert’s sings When the Saints Go Marching In with a new partner.

Bobby and his funny Satchmo voice….
WHO DAT

What are you doing this Sunday? I am enjoying the Redzone, pulling against Cowboys, Falcons and Vikings!!

Sep

19

MORE… interesting comments from the Who Dat Nation about who “owns” Who Dat.

butterbeer September 16, 2010 at 10:52PM

who knows who said “who dat” for the first time, but we all know its not this fool from Texas. All the defendants have to do is ask for a jury and they will NEVER get a dime. WHO DAT!!!!!!!!!!

nanunanu September 16, 2010 at 11:05PM

Monistere has no legal case. This has already been established. I think it is interesting that he had to go all the way to San Antonio to find a lawyer to take this sham of a case. It really is a shame that he is wasting other peoples time on this stupidity.

kamar September 16, 2010 at 11:07PM

Hmmm, after 27 years of “owning” the trademark to the phrase this fool finally decides to sue?

I would think that standing idly by all these years would suggest his tacit approval of free use of the phrase.

TheSixWardGhostWontDie2 September 16, 2010 at 11:07PM

If the saints record was 0-16 in the last 3 seasons,,none of these clowns would be trying to claiming WHO DAT….

Kadie September 17, 2010 at 12:00PM

GET A LIFE YOU IGNORANT PERSON! It’s all in good fun. They say dat to have fun bc we are from the South & it’s how some talk when speaking fast. I can’t not fathom how mean your are for posting something like this! We are the only team in the NFL that has fun sayings to chant as a crowd. The crunk song, it’s great fun, even my grandmother dances to it. WOW you do call yourself a Saints fan but can’t appreciate fun. You must be one boring person WITH ABSOLUTELY HORRID COMPANY. You actually sound more stupid than any of the above mentioned phrases you have pointed out. If we stole a song from anyone, wait wait I’m thinking the YING YANG TWINS not the falcons. I’m pretty sure the song was customized for us right….I could go on & on about your ignorant post but more so I’m going to laugh at you with the rest of THE WHO DAT FANS THAT READ YOUR POST! Go on with your boring life bc you ARE NOT a true Saints fan!! WHO DAT! WHO DAT SEY DEY GONNA BEAT DEM SAINTS! STAND UP AND GET CRUNK!!!

toulagal September 16, 2010 at 11:20PM

WHO DAT NATION! RISE AND TELL THOSE JERKS TO BACK OFF! GEAUX FLEURTY GIRL AND STORYVILLE APPAREL AND ANY OTHER MERCHANT/FAN WHO USES WHO DAT! kamar and thesixwardghostwontdie2 hit the nail on the head with their remarks! WHO DAT! WHO DAT! WHO DAT! WE DAT!

teegirl September 16, 2010 at 11:26PM

I agree. Where has he been all these years? We didn’t just start saying ‘Who Dat’ last season! What a jerk! So I can go trademark a phrase and ‘own’ it. How ridiculous! If the NFL backed down over the public outcry, then this guy doesn’t have a chance. I suggest people boycott his ‘who dat’ products that he sells in retail outlets in the area. Greedy S.O.B.!

brtboss September 16, 2010 at 11:47PM

Alot of people are fair weather Saints fans. Once the Saints started doing good people came from everywhere. If they start doing bad again, those same fans will start trash talking, bringing their bags, and stop wearing their jerseys. As far as the WHO DAT goes, this guy seen an opportunity to make some money since the Saints are Super Bowl Champs. I also feel that all these people who opened up the stores, boutiques, and kiosks are just as guilty as this guy because they are doing the same thing. Where were all these people at when the Saints weren’t so hot? In the words of Rapper Mike Jones, “Back then they didn’t want em…Now they hot, they all on em” Now, with that said, I’m not saying it’s wrong to be a fan or become a new fan, just don’t act like you own something that you despised in the previous years under past coaches/players.

Sep

18

Analyst: ‘Who Dat’ Ownership Debate Will Head To Court

SLIDELL, La. — The fate of the ownership of the popular “Who Dat” phrase will soon be decided on in court as the people claiming trademark ownership on the chant have asked a federal judge to weigh in on the issue, a legal analyst said on Friday.Legal analyst Chick Foret said the Monistere brothers asked for a jury trial on the issue.“The case is pending in front of Federal Judge Carl Barbier, and the most interesting thing about this case is that the plaintiff, Who Dat Inc., has asked for a jury trial. So Who Dats themselves will decide who owns ‘Who Dat,’” Foret said.

Read the rest of the story here.

Sep

18

Interesting Comments from the Who Dat Nation about who “owns” Who Dat.

The drama has started again. The comment sections across various Who Dat Nation forums, message boards, and newspapers have been pretty one sided…. It is apparent that the Monistere brothers failed to understand the kind of storm they have created by threatening the Who Dat Nation.

juvi50 September 17, 2010 at 10:02AM
Follow

Did Monistere send a warning letter to Drew Brees when he told everyone that would be in the Dome on Thursday night to yell the Who Dat chant after the coin toss? Drew made that statement on nationally televised programming and on radio. That should be major infringement shouldn’t it?
Monistere wants to go after the small people. His original trademark, which he let expire, expired many, many years ago when the Saints were not good.
Hell, from what I hear, he’s lived in San Antonio most his life and hasn’t done anything with “his” supposed Who Dat until the recent success of OUR New Orleans Saints in the late 2000’s.

Open letter to Monistere:

Leave our city, our team alone. We never left our city or never stopped watching the Saints on tv every Sunday , unlike you Mr. Monistere. Get over it. You fumbled and the city of New Orleans and its RESIDENTS picked the ball up and scored. Your loss. Now stop being a sore loser and go home.

++++++++++++++++

oddly September 17, 2010 at 9:22AM
Follow

You might own the rights to the song “Who Dat” but NO ONE owns the words “Who” and “Dat” (and “dat” is not even a real word — I mean, I know it is for Saints fans in New Orleans, but…) These guys are now acting like the NFL – complete jerks. Come on into the Dome and try and tell 70,000 fans not to do the “Who Dat” chant and see what happens. Uh, yeah — good luck with “dat” one.

+++++++++++++++++++

msynative September 17, 2010 at 10:18AM
Follow

PURE GREED!!! I say everyone should give him your opinion via his website or FB page. He’s not hard to find. I think he should reconsider the lawsuits or his name is mud in this town.

+++++++++++++++++++

YuccaBeast September 17, 2010 at 10:36AM
Follow

How can they claim ownership of a chant that originated in the late 19th century? Read about the history of ‘who dat’ here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Dat%3F.

+++++++++++++++++++

Searious1 September 17, 2010 at 3:21PM
Follow

Are they going to sue every WHO DAT in the country? Bring DAT on!

++++++++++++++++++++

larris September 17, 2010 at 4:33PM
Follow

It seems that this guy copyrighted a phrase that was pretty much public domain , because he got somebody to record a song based on the chant. Then he sat on it for more than 25 years ’til the Saints became a championship team , and now the jerk wants to get paid. I’m no legal expert , but if I was on the jury , I’d look at those facts and rule against him.
Please remember , no matter how cheap they might get , don’t buy that Who Dat cd with the Aaron Neville and the Singing Saints. Nothing against Aaron , but I don’t want Monistere to make another nickel. He didn’t create anything , but now , he wants to get rich off others’ creativity.

+++++++++++++++++

saintron September 17, 2010 at 7:55PM
Follow

First time I hear “WHO DAT?” was years ago in a comical song on WTIX. Song was about a guy in a haunted house. He thought he heard someone say WHO DAT? Then he said WHO DAT SAYING WHO DAT? Anyone remember this song????????

+++++++++++++++++++++

luv4nola September 17, 2010 at 10:52PM
Follow

The people and loyal supporters of the Saints own the phrase Who Dat! Frivolous lawsuit and it won’t fly.

+++++++++++++++++++

see unlevel September 18, 2010 at 9:56AM
Follow

Mr. Smiley,Put the brief case down,pick up the bass guitar case,and go get a real job.
Oh, that’s right,it’s like real work or Buy a Lottery Ticket your odds of winning are about the same,especially against a Jurist wearing a Saints T-Shirt.

Sep

18

New Brees pre-game chant for 2010

Always gets me pumped up.

Sep

17

‘Who Dat’ ownership battle set for conference Oct. 7

Maybe it’s time to fill the courts !!

9/6/2010 9:34 PM By Alejandro de los Rios

A scheduling conference has been set for Oct. 7 in a suit between parties fighting over who has ownership of the term “Who Dat.”

In March, New Orleans attorney Darleen Jacobs filed a petition for declaratory judgment in Orleans Parish Civil District Court against Sal Monistere – who has claimed ownership of the phrase “Who Dat,” associated with the New Orleans Saints – claiming that “no one owns the phrase ‘Who Dat’.”

Magistrate Judge Christine Noland is overseeing the case. The conference will address damages, discovery and establish a possible trial date, among other logistical issues.

The suit was originally filed on behalf of Who Dat Yat Chat LLC, a cafe opened outside of New Orleans with a trademarked name registered in May 2007. The plaintiffs claim that they received a notice in March 2010 from Monistere stating that Who Dat? Inc. is “the sole owner of the phrase ‘Who Dat’ and all derivations thereof.”

A search in United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Electronic Search System reveals that 28 trademarks have been filed that use the phrase ‘Who Dat’ in some capacity, 18 of which are still live.

Read the rest of the story here.

Sep

17

Want to see a “warning letter”

wdnletter

Sep

17

‘Who Dat’ warning letters sent to merchants yet again

Frank Donze, The Times-Picayune

The emotional issue of who gets to cash in on “Who Dat” mania looks like it’s headed for a courtroom.

Who Dat? Inc., the company that registered the chant that’s inextricably linked to the New Orleans Saints, this week warned local merchants who sell “Who Dat” merchandise to come to the table to work out deal or face the music.

The demand letters came three months after a San Antonio law firm representing Who Dat? Inc. sent “cease and desist” letters to the same retailers informing them that continued sales of Who Dat products constituted an infringement of the company’s property rights.

In the latest correspondence, the Davis, Cedillo & Mendoza law firm instructs store owners to contact Steve Monistere, one of the firm’s principals, “if you wish to discuss a resolution of the claims related to your past usage of WHO DAT and explore the terms for a relationship moving forward.” Monistere recorded the “Who Dat” chant over “When the Saints Go Marching In” in 1983, and then registered a trademark on the phrase.

Read the rest of the story here.

Sep

16

Reggie Bush has decided to move forward and distance himself from the past

By Jeff Duncan

Reggie Bush did more than just forfeit the Heisman Trophy on Tuesday.

In announcing plans to return his 2005 award, Bush effectively divorced himself from the past.

No more lies.

No more denials.

The gaudy wins, Pac-10 titles and bowl victories have been swept from the record books.

All that remains from his college career are the YouTube highlights and faded press clippings.

When he agreed to give back his Heisman Trophy, he essentially took off his wedding ring and threw it in the Pacific Ocean.

Read the rest of the story here.

Sep

11

Anthony Hargrove works on da Fluer de Leap

The Who Dat Nation loves #69 and from this video the love is mutual!!


Pages


Archives